置身於急遽變動的時代，原本單一、穩定的自我形象，已成為一種持續變動的狀態。每個人都在多重張力中被構成——在原生包袱與自我選擇之間，在文化脈絡與個體意志之間，在虛擬敘事與現實語境的交錯中——我們不斷被拉扯、拆解、重組，形成曖昧卻具體的自我邊界。

​

碎裂化的現象，看似指向最終的分裂，卻也可以視為一種利於生成的狀態。我們在碎裂中孕育、矛盾中延展、未竟中繼續前行。

​

如同一面破裂的鏡子，不再映照出單一清晰的形象，而是開啟了流動與斷裂的視角。自我穿行於裂縫與碎片之間，從錯落的反射中尋找可辨認的形態，也因此觸及原本隱沒的面向——那變形的自我，以及通往他者的縫隙與連結。

​

這些錯位的視差不再指向整全，而是展開裂縫中另一種感知方式，映現持續變動的形態與視野。

​

而創作如光，照亮裂縫。非整全的視角，得以映射出更多樣的面向，讓彼此的觀看成為關係建構的起點。

​

對於破碎的我們，並非每個面向都能被接納，也不一定能被準確映現。每一次凝視，都可能帶著偏差、投射、渴望與恐懼——誤解，因此發生。

​

然而，一次次透過裂縫與斷面觀看自身與他者，新的角度與映像是否得以生成？
 

或許，恰是在這樣不確定的觀看中，一種願意於破碎中相遇的姿態才得以浮現。它無意整合一切，而是從碎片與裂縫中開拓另種交會的可能。在差異與模糊之間，我們嘗試理解、對話，練習共處。正是這樣帶有偏差與裂縫的距離，使我們得以彼此嵌入、交流、拼湊，開展理解與探索的空間。

 

​從自身裂痕出發，將那些邊緣、未竟與模糊的部分交付影像。在彼此觀看的過程中，我們不再只是孤立的碎片，而是共同映射出一幅斷裂卻鮮活、破碎卻閃耀的當代樣貌，而我們攜帶著各自的碎片，穿越光影的縫隙，在破裂與交會中，拼湊出通往彼此的連結。

​

In this precipitous time, the stability of our figure has become a constantly shifting picture. We are torn between original burden and self-choosing, cultural bloodline and personal will. The boundary of oneself becomes ambiguous as it is pulled, unraveled, and rebuilt, crossing between fictional narratives and real contexts.

​

Shattered as it seems, this phenomenon can be regarded as a generative state. We break forward, growing and breeding through contradiction and incompleteness.

​

A floating, fracturing vision opens like a broken mirror, no longer reflecting a single clear image. The self moves through clefts and fragments, searching for an identifiable form among scattered reflections. Thus, an unseen aspect emerges, revealing the transforming self and the gaps and connections leading toward others.

​

These uneven sights no longer point to wholeness, but open up another way of perception through cracks, reflecting continuously shifting forms and visions.

​

Creation lights up the cracks. Through incomplete ways of seeing, more diverse aspects can be reflected. Each gaze toward the other becomes the starting point for building relationships.

​

Not all of the perspectives can be embraced, as we are broken. Not all of the angles can be accurately reflected, as each gaze may carry bias, projection, desire, and fear. Therefore, misunderstanding happens.

​

However, can new angles and reflections be generated as we gaze again and again through the cracks and broken surfaces?

​

Perhaps, it is precisely within this uncertain gaze that a posture willing to encounter through fragmentation can emerge. It does not seek to integrate everything, but instead opens up a different possibility of meeting through fragments and gaps. Between differences and blurriness, we try to understand, to dialogue, and to practice coexistence. It is precisely this distance—with its biases and cracks—that allows us to embed, communicate, and piece each other together, opening spaces for understanding and exploration.

​

We depart from our own cracks, entrusting parts that dance on the blurry, incomplete edge to images. In the process of gazing at one another, we are no longer isolated fragments, but together we reflect a broken yet vivid, shattered yet shining image of our times. 

​

Carrying each of our own fragments, we pass through gaps of light and shadow, piecing together connections to each other through rupture and encounter.​​​​​

​​​​​​​​